Comparison of Clinical and Anatomical Outcomes between Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tear and Single Layer Rotator Cuff Tear

Article information

Clin Shoulder Elb. 2018;21(4):207-212

Publication date (electronic) : 2018 December 1

doi : https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.4.207

Jin-Woo Park, Sung-Hoon Moon, Jun-Hee Lee

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea

Correspondence to: Sung-Hoon Moon Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, 1 Gangwondaehak-gil, Chuncheon 24341, Korea Tel: +82-33-258-9224, Fax: +82-33-258-2149, E-mail: luteus@naver.com

Received 2018 September 9; Revised 2018 October 15; Accepted 2018 October 16.

Abstract

Introduction

Delamination of the rotator cuff is commonly found in rotator cuff tears, with a higher incidence seen in medium sized tears [1,2]. The incidence of delamination is reported to be between 38% to 92% [1-3]. However, the exact etiology of delamination is not proven. Some authors have reported the anatomical characteristics of the rotator cuff, and demonstrated that delamination occurs between the two layers [4,5]. Several authors have reported that delamination is a negative prognostic factor in clinical and anatomical outcomes after rotator cuff repair [1,2,6]. However, a controversy still exists since some authors suggest that delamination has no effect on the outcomes of rotator cuff repair [7].

This study was therefore undertaken to assess the clinical and anatomical outcomes after rotator cuff repair by comparing delaminated rotator and single layer rotator cuff tears.

Methods

This study was designed as a retrospective comparative study (level III).

Preoperative Evaluation

All patients were subjected to preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and interpretation and measurement of the obtained oblique coronal images was performed by a single surgeon to assess delamination of the tendon and length of the remnant tendon (Fig. 1) [8]. The clearest image of the tendon midportion was used to assess the remnant tendon length, which was measured from midpoint of the lateral edge of the torn tendon to the musculotendinous junction. The exact remnant tendon length was difficult to determine in delaminated tears due to the difference in length between the outer and inner layer tendons. Therefore, we measured the tendon length on images that showed minimal difference between the two layers, and determined remnant tendon length as the average of two tendon lengths. Muscle atrophy of the supraspinatus (SS) was measured by using the occupation ratio on oblique sagittal ‘Y’ view (Fig. 2). The occupation ratio is defined as the ratio between the cross-sectional area of the SS muscle and SS fossa. It was obtained using a picture archiving and communication system, as described by Thomazeau et al. [9]. Fatty degeneration of SS and infraspinatus (IS) were also measured using the grading system developed by Goutallier et al. (Fig. 3) [10].

Fig. 1.

Measurement of the remnant tendon length and evaluation of delamination was done on oblique coronal T2 weighted image in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. (A) Remnant tendon length was measured from the midpoint of lateral edge of the torn tendon to the musculotendinous junction on the clearest image obtained of the ‘midportion of tendon’. (B) Delamination of tendon was evaluated on oblique coronal image (arrows).

Fig. 2.

Muscle atrophy of supraspinatus was measured using occupation ratio at ‘Y’ view on oblique sagittal image in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Fig. 3.

Fatty degeneration were evaluated on axial and oblique sagittal images in the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. (A) Supraspinatus. (B) Infraspinatus.

The Constant Score (CS) and Korean Shoulder Score (KSS) were evaluated by questionnaires before surgery.

Surgical Procedure

All patients were subjected to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the beach chair position. Conventional glenohumeral examination was done using the standard posterior and anterior portal. Tear shape and delamination were evaluated on bursoscopy using the lateral portal. The location of delamination and direction of retracted inner-layer were measured if delamination was detected (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Intraoperatively, the tear shape was evaluated at the lateral portal of bursoscopy. (A) Single layer tear. (B) Delaminated tear.

Suture bridge double row (SBDR) repair was performed in cases of single layer rotator cuff tear, whereas SBDR (En-masse SBDR, EM-SBDR) repair was done in all cases of delaminated rotator cuff tear (Fig. 5) [7]. During EM-SBDR, synovial tissue between the two layers and the non-viable tissues were debrided first, after which the more retracted inner layer was secured with a tension suture; the suture was passed through the whole tendon whilst maintaining tension of the tension suture. After passing all sutures through the whole tendon, a conventional suture bridge repair was performed.

Fig. 5.

Rotator cuff repair. (A) Suture bridge double row repair was done for single layer tears. (B, C) En-masse suture bridge double row repair was done in cases of delaminated tears.

Postoperative Evaluation

During follow-up, repair integrity was evaluated by ultrasonography at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Retear was defined as discontinuity of tendon and graded more than 4 in the Sugaya grading system (Fig. 6) [11].

Fig. 6.

Repair integrity was followed by ultrasonography. (A) Intact repair integrity. (B) Retear. (A) Arrows indicate intact articular and bursal layer of repaired tendon. (B) Arrow indicates discontinuity of tendon. Rt SS: supraspinatus, Lt SS: supraspinatus.

CS and KSS were assessed at the final follow-up for overall clinical outcomes.

Results

Of the 175 patients enrolled, 92 were designated to group 1, and 83 to group 2. The mean follow-up period was 15.9 ± 4.8 months (range, 12–27 months).

Retears were detected in 6 cases (6.5%) of group 1 and 11 cases (13.3%) of group 2. Although the retear rate was higher in group 2, there was no significant difference (p=0.133) (Table 1). In group 1, retear appeared at postoperative 3 months in 2 cases and 6 months in 4 cases. In group 2, retear appeared at postoperative 3 months in 6 cases and 6 months in 5 cases.

Table 1.

Comparison of Retear Rate between Single Layer Tear and Delaminated Tear

In preoperative MRI, length of the remnant tendon was 15.46 ± 3.60 mm in group 1, and 14.17 ± 3.16 mm in group 2 (p=0.013), and muscle atrophy of SS (occupation ratio) was 60.54 ± 13.15 in group 1, and 56.55 ±12.88 in group 2 (p=0.045). Fatty degeneration of SS and IS showed no significant differences (SS: 1.55±0.65 and 1.57±0.55 in group 1 and 2, respectively, p=0.896; IS: 1.71 ± 0.64 and 1.86 ± 0.65 in group 1 and 2, respectively, p=0.127) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Comparison of Factors between Two Groups

When comparing between groups based on retear, the remnant tendon length and fatty degeneration of IS were significantly different between the retear and non-retear groups (remnant tendon length: 12.90 ± 3.67 and 15.05 ± 3.37 in retear and non-retear group, respectively, p=0.012; fatty degeneration of IS: 2.18 ± 0.64 and 1.73 ± 0.63 in retear and non-retear group, respectively, p=0.008) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Comparison of Factors between Retear and Non-retear Groups

At final follow-up, clinical scores were improved in all cases. CS were 71.64 ± 8.09 in group 1 and 71.14 ± 7.05 in group 2 (p=0.667). KSS were 75.51 ± 8.64 in group 1 and 74.65 ± 8.58 in group 2 (p=0.510). There were no significant differences in clinical scores between both groups (Table 4).

Table 4.

Clinical Outcomes at Final Follow-up between Single Layer Tear and Delaminated Tear

Discussion

Results from our study showed no significant differences in the retear rates between single layer tear and delaminated tear groups, indicating that delamination is not related to anatomical outcomes.

Although a known degenerative change of rotator cuff tears, the cause of delamination is not clearly understood. Sonnabend et al. [4] reported delamination to be generally found between layers having different fiber orientation, with local ischemia contributing to delamination. Furthermore, delamination revealed the presence of a synovial lining, which was found to be related to symptom duration. Hence, the authors recommended debridement of the synovial lining during rotator cuff repair.

Some authors report that delamination is a poor prognostic factor for rotator cuff repair [1,2]. However, recent studies have reported no significant differences in the clinical outcomes when comparing delamination with single layer tear [3,7,12,13].

Kim et al. [14] compared the clinical and anatomical outcomes of delaminated and non-delaminated groups, and reported no significant differences between both groups. In our study, good clinical outcomes (CS, KSS) were achieved across all cases, with no significant differences between single layer tears and delaminated tears.

Considering tendon healing, Park et al. [7] reported no significant association between delamination and retear rate. Kim et al. [14] classified three types of tendon healing: complete healing, partially healed defect, and retear. They reported partially healed defects were significantly high in delaminated tears but had a lower rate in retears, thereby indicating the cause to be differing tension between the layers after repair. Their study concluded that delamination may not be a poor prognostic factor for rotator cuff repair. In our study, the follow-up ultrasonography of retears determined that although not significant, the retear rate was higher in delaminated tears.

Several researches have studied the predictive factors responsible for retear after rotator cuff repair [15-17]. Kim et al. [18] evaluated factors affecting healing after rotator cuff repair, and reported that multiple factors influence tendon healing, including delamination and remnant tendon length. Additionally, they suggested the extent of retraction and occupation ratio as determining prognostic factors. Jeong et al. [19] reported the cutoff values of occupation ratio of SS and fatty infiltration of the IS were 43% and grade 2, respectively, which suggests these factors as strong predictors of retear. In our current study, in terms of existence of retear, remnant tendon length, and fatty degeneration of IS were significantly different between the retear and non-retear groups; the retear group showed significantly shorter remnant tendon length and higher fatty degeneration of IS compared to non-retear group. We therefore propose these to be predictable factors for higher retear rates.

The remnanat tendon length is also reported as a factor affecting tendon healing [8,20]. Kim et al. [8] reported higher retear rate in patients with short remnant tendon, and suggested single row repair with low repair tension for such cases. In our study, the delaminated tear group showed significantly shorter remnant tendon length and higher muscle atrophy (lower occupation ratio) compared to the single layer tear group; however, these observations are unable to explain delamination as a negative prognostic factor for clinical outcomes.

There are few limitations in our study. First, this study was a retrospective study. Second, there was some difficulty in procuring exact preoperative MRI evaluation for remnant tendon length.

Conclusion

The data generated from the current study indicates that the retear rate is significantly not different between single layer tears and delaminated tears. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in clinical scores. Hence, it is reasonable to elucidate that delamination of the tendon is not a significant negative prognostic factor.

Article information Continued