| A Comparison between Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis and Arthroscopic Repair in Isolated Type 2 Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior Lesions |
| Kyung Jin Hong, Doo Sup Kim, Ji Su Shin, Sang Kyu Kang |
| Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea. dskim1974@hanmail.net |
|
Received: 9 August 2016 • Revised: 7 December 2016 • Accepted: 11 December 2016 |
| Abstract |
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome in patients aged less than 55 years who underwent arthroscopic tenodesis and arthroscopic repair for type 2 superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions.
METHODS
Between April 2008 and December 2014, surgery was performed on a total of 45 patients with isolated type 2 SLAP lesions. Arthroscopic repair was performed in 22 patients and arthroscopic tenodesis was performed in 23 patients. In both groups, the clinical outcomes at follow-ups were evaluated using the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score.
RESULTS
In both groups, the VAS scores for pain had improved significantly throughout the postoperative follow-up period. The VAS score showed a statistically significant difference at postoperative 3 and 6 months (p<0.05); however, there was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative results at 12 months (p>0.05). In both groups, the functional outcome was statistically improved postoperatively. In a comparison of the UCLA and ASES scores between the two groups, there was a statistically significant difference at postoperative 3 and 6 months (p<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative results at 12 months (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of this and other studies, patients with isolated type 2 SLAP lesions showed better short-term clinical outcome with tenodesis than with repair. However, there was no difference between the two groups at the final follow-up. |
| Key Words:
Type 2 superior labrum anterior and posterior; Biceps tenodesis; Repair; Shoulder |
|
PDF Links
Full text via DOI
Download Citation
