Clin Shoulder Elb Search

CLOSE


Clin Shoulder Elb > Volume 28(4); 2025 > Article
Baek, Kim, Lee, Yoo, Jo, Kim, and Yoo: Human dermal allograft patch cushioning augmentation in large rotator cuff repair

Abstract

In large posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, retear is more likely due to factors such as poor tendon quality, tendon loss, incomplete footprint coverage, and incomplete repair. To reduce the retear rate and promote healing, various strategies have been explored, including augmentation using a human acellular dermal matrix (HADM) allograft patch. However, the traditional patch augmentation with a suture-bridge configuration is complicated and time consuming. Another method to alleviate impingement between the repaired tendon and acromion, similar to the ballooning effect in the subacromial space, is the acromiograft technique. However, a thin acromion may lead to fractures, and such a graft is less likely to incorporate with the repaired tendon. To address these concerns, we developed a new technique that enhances healing through direct contact with the repaired tendon, alleviates impingement with a spacer effect, and simplifies the procedure while ensuring adequate medial coverage including the musculotendinous junction. This article describes our “patch cushioning technique” using an HADM allograft. The present report provides a purely technical description of the procedure.

Retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) has a critical impact on clinical outcomes. Retear rates are reported to vary from 13% to 94%, depending on age, initial tear size, and degree of fatty degeneration [1-3]. Tissue quality also is an important factor in rotator cuff healing, and a variety of other biological factors can affect healing after rotator cuff repair [4,5]. Various attempts are being made to reduce the retear rate after rotator cuff repair. Patch augmentation is being used as one of several attempts to reduce rotator cuff retear rate. Recently, good results have been reported using a human acellular dermal matrix (HADM) allograft. Studies have reported that it reduces the retear rate and improves clinical outcome after ARCR [6-8].
There are many different patch augmentation techniques, and while simple methods have been introduced, there are many difficulties, such as delivering the patch, correct positioning, and managing the numerous suture strands [9-11]. These hinder use of a patch that is large and thick, limiting medial coverage, including the musculotendinous junction. Cho et al. [12] reported that type 2 retears usually occur at the musculotendinous junction, a distinctively vulnerable area. Favorable outcomes have been reported following patch augmentation repair for rotator cuff re-tears at this site [13].
Another positive effect of HADM allograft augmentation is the spacer effect between the repaired tendon and acromion. Balloon insertion and acromiograft aim to improve joint stability by anchoring the humeral head to increase the acromiohumeral interval [14,15]. However, some have questioned the effectiveness of balloon insertion, as the material dissolves within 1 year. Additionally, acromiograft may be more challenging if the acromion is thin [14,16]. Furthermore, an acromiograft does not enhance tendon healing as it does not contact the repaired tendon.
Therefore, this study aims to describe a simple method for patch support after rotator cuff repair using a large, thick patch with sufficient medial coverage. Furthermore, this technique provides a spacer or cushioning effect, referred to as the ‘Patch Cushioning’ effect, between the repaired tendon and the acromion.

TECHNIQUE

The surgery was performed in the lateral decubitus position, and the locations of the surgical portals are illustrated in Fig. 1. As the surgical technique described in this study is performed after completion of ARCR, our explanation begins from that point. The entire surgical procedure is demonstrated in Supplementary Video 1.
As this report describes a surgical technique and does not involve patient data or clinical outcomes, informed consent was not applicable. In addition, because it is a technical note, it was exempt from institutional review board approval.

Preparation of the Patch

An HADM allograft (SC Derm, DOF Inc.) measuring 3.5 cm across, 4.5 cm long, and 3–4 mm thick was prepared for each patient. An arrow was marked in the center of the patch to indicate the anterior side. Using different colors of thread, suturing strands were passed with a margin of at least 7 mm from the edge of the patch and 1 cm from both the anterior and posterior lateral ends. Two strands were secured at the center and anterior of the medial side of the patch. The anterior and posterior relay strands on the lateral side were secured using the ‘Mega-knot’ technique (Fig. 2) [17].

Preparation of the Passing Suture and Medial Fixation of the Patch

After exposing the coracoid base, a hole was prepared to insert a knotless anchor (PushLock, Arthrex Inc.) from the anterolateral (AL) portal. In the scapular spine, a suture anchor (Suturefix Ultra, Smith & Nephew Inc.) was inserted from the anterior traction portal, and the strands were tied for immobilization. A relay strand was inserted through each of the Neviaser and AL portal (Fig. 2). The cannula in the lateral portal was replaced with a 12-mm canula (Kii optical access system, Applied Medical Resources Corp.). One end of each relay strand was pulled through the lateral portal. The medial side strands of the patch graft were passed through the Neviaser and AL portals by shuttling with the relay strands (Fig. 3). The anchor strands inserted in the scapular spine were passed on the posteromedial side of the patch graft using a suture passer (Scorpion, Arthrex Inc.) after being pulled through the lateral portal.

Insertion of the Patch

Patch delivery was performed using a knot pusher while applying traction to the medial side of the patch. After tying the strands passed through the posteromedial aspect of the patch graft, the graft is inserted through the lateral portal and secured using a knot pusher. A knotless anchor was loaded with strands from the anteromedial side of the patch graft from the AL portal and then inserted into the prepared hole at the coracoid base. After passing the lateral strands of the patch graft through the anterior and posterior traction portals, respectively, the 12-mm cannula in the lateral portal was replaced with an 8.25-mm cannula (Expanula, Arthrex Inc.). The anterior and posterior strands on the lateral side of the patch graft were replaced with the lateral anchor strands via shuttle relay and secured with a knot tie (Fig. 4). Additional surgical technique recommendations are listed in Table 1.

Postoperative Rehabilitation

Depending on the tear size and repairability, patients were instructed to wear an abduction brace for 4–6 weeks to immobilize the shoulder. Passive motion was allowed depending on the integrity of the repair after 2 to 6 weeks. Active exercise was permitted at 8 to 12 weeks, and strengthening exercises were performed 12 weeks after surgery.

DISCUSSION

The retear rate is expected to be higher in type II repairs that do not fully cover the greater tuberosity footprint or in cases with poor tissue quality. To address this, an HADM allograft was used to reduce the risk of retear [18,19]. This type of allograft is currently the most widely used graft, and HADM allograft augmentation in ARCR has shown better clinical outcome and improved tendon healing compared to cases using other grafts types [20]. Snyder et al. [21] reported evidence of incorporation at 3 months postoperatively by biopsy. Favorable results of cuff healing have been reported in patients with cuff retear at the musculotendinous junction with allograft augmentation [13]. Human cadaveric studies have shown that HADM allograft augmentation can increase biomechanical load to failure compared to standard repair [22]. It has been suggested that patch augmentation indirectly reduces the load on the repaired tendon during the initial healing phase [23].
One of the main effects of such augmentation is the spacer effect, which reduces the likelihood of impingement of the repaired tendon on the acromion. Impingement can occur due to an increase in the superior translation of the humerus. In line with this concept, a meta-analysis of cadaveric studies involving subacromial balloon insertion demonstrated a mean inferior translation of the humeral head by 4.8 mm, accompanied by improved subacromial contact pressure [24]. A cadaveric study on acromiografts demonstrated that a graft thickness of 3 mm was sufficient to achieve the intended therapeutic effects [25]. Accordingly, we used a 3-mm-thick HADM with the expectation of comparable outcomes (Fig. 5). Tuberoplasty using HADM could increase the acromiohumeral distance to improve subacromial contact characteristics during abduction [26]. Clinical studies on large to massive rotator cuff repair with HADM allograft augmentation have reported improved clinical outcomes along with an increase in acromiohumeral distance [27].
Despite these advantages, allograft augmentation is a time-consuming and technically challenging procedure. While sufficient coverage and thickness of the graft are the goal, a large, thick graft hinders delivery and positioning. Additionally, the larger is the number of fixation strands of a patch graft, the more complex is its management. In this study, a 12-mm cannula was used for delivery of a graft with sufficient size and thickness, and a minimal number of strands was used for fixation. Medial anchoring was performed at the coracoid base and scapular spine to ensure sufficient coverage of the medial area, including the musculotendinous junction. Instead of a knotless anchor, a suture anchor was inserted into the posteromedial aspect and was difficult to visualize due to the overlying muscle; the graft was subsequently delivered using its suture strands. By pre-passing the strands at the remaining corners of the graft, we minimized the steps required after graft delivery.
The technique described in this study is similar to the supra-capsular reconstruction in that the medial side of the allograft is fixed to the scapula, while the lateral side is fixed to the humerus. Labib et al. [28] conducted a biomechanical study and found that the lengths and excursions of shoulder muscles, such as the supraspinatus and infraspinatus, are maintained during shoulder abduction.
The patch cushioning technique described above is a simple, reproducible procedure that is expected to provide biomechanically improved construction for poor-quality rotator cuff tears. It may be particularly indicated in patients with large rotator cuff tears and poor cuff tissue quality, in whom a defect at the greater tuberosity footprint is anticipated following cuff repair, and the risk of retear at the musculotendinous junction is high. Since this study presents a purely technical description, clinical outcomes have not yet been reported, but we plan to present 2-year follow-up results in the near future.

NOTES

Author contributions

Conceptualization: JCY, HGK. Investigation: EB, JHL, SJY, JHJ. Project administration: JCY. Supervision: JCY, HGK, SCK. Visualization: EB, JHL, SJY, JHJ. Writing – original draft: EB. Writing – review & editing: JCY. All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Jae Chul Yoo is an editorial board member of the journal but was not involved in the peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or decision process of this article. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Funding

None.

Data availability

Contact the corresponding author for data availability.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jungyon Ko (Information & Media Services, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea) for the illustration.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary materials can be found via https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2025.00311.
Supplementary Video 1.

Fig. 1.
Outside lateral photograph of the right shoulder positioned in lateral decubitus, demonstrating the locations of established arthroscopic portals. N: neviaser portal, P: posterior portal, PL: posterolateral portal, AL: anterolateral portal, A: anterior portal, PT: posterior traction portal, L: lateral portal, AT: anterior traction portal.
cise-2025-00311f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Illustration demonstrating suture passage and medial fixation preparation for patch placement. AL: anterolateral.
cise-2025-00311f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Illustration of the right shoulder after insertion of the patch allograft. After using a knot pusher to insert the patch, the posteromedial strand was tied. AL: anterolateral, PT: posterior traction, AT: anterior traction.
cise-2025-00311f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
Illustration of the final construct.
cise-2025-00311f4.jpg
Fig. 5.
Coronal (A) and sagittal (B) oblique magnetic resonance imaging views at 6 months postoperative.
cise-2025-00311f5.jpg
Table 1.
Pearls and pitfalls
Pearls
 (Preparation for the patch) When preparing the allograft, consider the distance between the lateral anchors and adjust the interval of the strands passed to the lateral side of the allograft.
 (Preparation of the passing suture and medial fixation of patch) The coracoid neck should be exposed and an appropriate bursectomy should be performed in the subacromial space to ensure proper positioning of the allograft.
 (Insertion of the patch) After passing the medial traction strand through the Neviaser portal, allograft traction and insertion with the knot pusher are performed simultaneously with the appropriate tension.
Pitfalls
 (Preparation for the patch) If the allograft lateral side strand interval is greater than the distance between the lateral anchors, the allograft may not be able to extend.
 (Preparation of the passing suture and medial fixation of patch) Without proper bursectomy in the subacromial space, proper positioning of the allograft is difficult and may result in poor positioning or folds, especially on the medial side.
 (Insertion of the patch) If the medial traction strands entangle with other strands, the allograft may fold or become difficult to insert.

REFERENCES

1. Lee YS, Jeong JY, Park CD, Kang SG, Yoo JC. Evaluation of the risk factors for a rotator cuff retear after repair surgery. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:1755-61.
crossref pmid
2. Huijsmans PE, Pritchard MP, Berghs BM, van Rooyen KS, Wallace AL, de Beer JF. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with double-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:1248-57.
crossref pmid
3. Tashjian RZ, Hollins AM, Kim HM, et al. Factors affecting healing rates after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2010;38:2435-42.
crossref pmid
4. Gumina S, Kim H, Jung Y, Song HS. Rotator cuff degeneration and healing after rotator cuff repair. Clin Shoulder Elb 2023;26:323-9.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Chung SW, Kim JY, Yoon JP, Lyu SH, Rhee SM, Oh SB. Arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness and small full-thickness rotator cuff tears: tendon quality as a prognostic factor for repair integrity. Am J Sports Med 2015;43:588-96.
crossref pmid
6. Hong SY, Lee SJ, Hahm HB, Chang JW, Hyun YS. Onlay patch augmentation in rotator cuff repair for moderate to large tears in elderly patients: clinical and radiologic outcomes. Clin Shoulder Elb 2023;26:71-81.
crossref pmid pmc
7. de Andrade AL, Garcia TA, Brandão HS, Sardeli AV, Mouraria GG, Belangero WD. Benefits of patch augmentation on rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 2022;10:23259671211071146.
pmid pmc
8. Namdari S, Nicholson T, Brolin TJ, Lu J, Abboud JA, Lazarus MD. Healing and functional results of dermal allograft augmentation of complex and revision rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med 2021;49:2042-7.
crossref pmid
9. Narvani AA, Consigliere P, Polyzois I, Sarkhel T, Gupta R, Levy O. "Owl" technique for all-arthroscopic augmentation of a massive or large rotator cuff tear with extracellular matrix graft. Arthrosc Tech 2016;5:e717-24.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Hirahara AM, Andersen WJ, Dooney T. Arthroscopic knotless rotator cuff repair with decellularized dermal allograft augmentation: the "canopy" technique. Arthrosc Tech 2020;9:e1797-803.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Tauro TM, Wagner KR, DeFroda SF, et al. Technical note: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with patch augmentation with acellular dermal allograft. Arthrosc Tech 2022;11:e121-e5.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG, Rhee YG. Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 2010;38:664-71.
crossref pmid
13. Hall T, Danielson K, Brandenburg S, Matelic T. A case series of recurrent myotendinous rotator cuff tears repaired and augmented with dermal allograft: clinical outcomes at two years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020;29:2264-71.
crossref pmid
14. Park HS, Lee HJ, Alsubaihim A, Kim YS. Arthroscopic acromiograft for large-to-massive rotator cuff tears: a rescue technique for restoring shoulder stability. Arthrosc Tech 2022;11:e1729-35.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Savarese E, Romeo R. New solution for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears: the subacromial "biodegradable spacer". Arthrosc Tech 2012;1:e69-74.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Metcalfe A, Parsons H, Parsons N, et al. Subacromial balloon spacer for irreparable rotator cuff tears of the shoulder (START:REACTS): a group-sequential, double-blind, multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2022;399:1954-63.

17. Kim JS, Kim SC, Park JH, et al. Arthroscopic incomplete rotator cuff repair with patch augmentation using acellular dermal matrix allograft. Arthrosc Tech 2023;12:e2203-9.
crossref pmid pmc
18. Lee GW, Kim JY, Lee HW, Yoon JH, Noh KC. Clinical and anatomical outcomes of arthroscopic repair of large rotator cuff tears with allograft patch augmentation: a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with a long-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Surg 2022;14:263-71.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Koh KH, Lim TK, Park YE, Lee SW, Park WH, Yoo JC. Preoperative factors affecting footprint coverage in rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2014;42:869-76.
crossref pmid
20. Bailey JR, Kim C, Alentorn-Geli E, et al. Rotator cuff matrix augmentation and interposition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2019;47:1496-506.
crossref pmid
21. Snyder SJ, Arnoczky SP, Bond JL, Dopirak R. Histologic evaluation of a biopsy specimen obtained 3 months after rotator cuff augmentation with GraftJacket Matrix. Arthroscopy 2009;25:329-33.
crossref pmid
22. Omae H, Steinmann SP, Zhao C, et al. Biomechanical effect of rotator cuff augmentation with an acellular dermal matrix graft: a cadaver study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012;27:789-92.
crossref pmid
23. Cobb TE, Dimock RA, Memon SD, et al. Rotator cuff repair with patch augmentation: what do we know. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2022;10:833-46.
crossref pmid pmc
24. Kunze KN, Moran J, Taylor SA, et al. Subacromial balloon spacer implantation for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears is associated with restoration of the acromiohumeral interval and glenohumeral center of pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled laboratory studies. Am J Sports Med 2023;51:3870-9.
crossref pmid
25. Cho SH, Park CJ, Kim SJ, et al. Bursal acromial resurfacing improves shoulder biomechanics in a cadaveric model of massive rotator cuff tear. Arthroscopy 2025;41:620-30.
crossref pmid
26. Lew R, Park M, Beyer R, et al. Acellular human dermal allograft tuberoplasty improved the biomechanics in mid-range and higher abduction angles in a cadaveric model of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2024;6:100868.
crossref pmid pmc
27. Kantanavar R, Lee IE, Rhee SM, Rhee YG. Outcomes of arthroscopic single-row repair alone vs. repair with human dermal allograft patch augmentation in patients with large to massive, posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: a retrospective comparative study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024;33:823-31.
crossref pmid
28. Labib M, Amirouche F, Pradhan S, Bobko A, Koh J. A biomechanical analysis of shoulder muscle excursions during abduction, after the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears using superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), bursal acromial reconstruction (BAR), and SCR with BAR. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2022;6:24715492221109001.
crossref pmid pmc


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#413, 10, Bamgogae-ro 1-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
E-mail: journal@cisejournal.org                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next