An overview of artificial intelligence and machine learning in shoulder surgery

Sung-Hyun Cho; Yang-Soo Kim

doi:10.5397/cise.2025.00185

Clin Shoulder Elb > Volume 28(2); 2025 > Article

Cho and Kim: An overview of artificial intelligence and machine learning in shoulder surgery

Concise Review

Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2025; 28(2): 242-250.

Published online: May 19, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2025.00185

An overview of artificial intelligence and machine learning in shoulder surgery

Sung-Hyun Cho

, Yang-Soo Kim

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding author: Yang-Soo Kim Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2258-2837 Fax: +82-2-535-9834 Email: kysoos@catholic.ac.kr

Received: February 25, 2025 Revised: April 22, 2025 Accepted: April 27, 2025

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Machine learning (ML), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), utilizes advanced algorithms to learn patterns from data, enabling accurate predictions and decision-making without explicit programming. In orthopedic surgery, ML is transforming clinical practice, particularly in shoulder arthroplasty and rotator cuff tears (RCTs) management. This review explores the fundamental paradigms of ML, including supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, alongside key algorithms such as XGBoost, neural networks, and generative adversarial networks. In shoulder arthroplasty, ML accurately predicts postoperative outcomes, complications, and implant selection, facilitating personalized surgical planning and cost optimization. Predictive models, including ensemble learning methods, achieve over 90% accuracy in forecasting complications, while neural networks enhance surgical precision through AI-assisted navigation. In RCTs treatment, ML enhances diagnostic accuracy using deep learning models on magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound, achieving area under the curve values exceeding 0.90. ML models also predict tear reparability with 85% accuracy and postoperative functional outcomes, including range of motion and patient-reported outcomes. Despite remarkable advancements, challenges such as data variability, model interpretability, and integration into clinical workflows persist. Future directions involve federated learning for robust model generalization and explainable AI to enhance transparency. ML continues to revolutionize orthopedic care by providing data-driven, personalized treatment strategies and optimizing surgical outcomes.

Key Words: Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Arthroplasty; Rotator cuff tears

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decade, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have transformed various medical fields, including orthopedic surgery. ML, a subset of AI, has been used to predict the outcomes of shoulder surgery, diagnose complex conditions, and enhance preoperative planning. From total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to rotator cuff tear (RCT), ML algorithms have improved clinical decision-making, optimized patient selection, and minimized complications. As the number of shoulder surgeries is increasing each year, ML will facilitate treatment personalization and efficiency, aiding both surgeons and patients.

In the context of shoulder surgery, there are three applications of ML. (1) Diagnostics: ML accurately identifies RCTs via imaging or image segmentation. (2) Prognostics: ML predicts the postoperative range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction, and complication risks. (3) Treatment: ML optimizes treatment by refining surgical planning, selecting the best implant, and anticipating healthcare costs. Such advances not only enhance predictive accuracy but also aid the development of data-driven decision-support tools that surgeons can integrate into daily practice.

This review explores the basics and relevance of ML in applications for shoulder surgery. We overview supervised and unsupervised learning and deep learning techniques such as artificial neural networks (ANNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We further review ML applications that aid shoulder arthroplasty and RCT treatment and discuss the potential roles of ML in diagnosis, prognosis, and conservation and surgical treatment options.

While ML has shown remarkable potential, further research and integration into real-world clinical workflows are necessary to fully harness its capabilities. This review comprehensively analyzes the current and possible future impacts of ML, offering valuable insights for orthopedic surgeons, researchers, and healthcare professionals who seek to incorporate AI-driven solutions into their shoulder surgery practices.

BACKGROUND OF MACHINE LEARNING

Introduction to ML

ML is a form of AI that focuses on the development of algorithms that learn patterns from data and then make predictions or decisions without the need for explicit programming. Unlike traditional rule-based programming (in which humans issue step-by-step instructions to computers), ML models use computational techniques to identify relationships among data and improve their understanding of such relationships over time to generalize new inputs. ML extracts useful insights from large datasets and has been shown to aid in decision-making in the fields of medicine, finance, engineering, and natural language processing (NLP) [1].

Learning Paradigms of ML

In general, ML uses three learning paradigms: supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning (RL). These paradigms differ in methods of models learning from the data and the problems they solve [2]. Supervised learning is the most widely used approach. Models are trained using labeled data, and each input is paired with a known output. The algorithm learns by minimizing the difference between predictions and actual outcomes, effectively handling classification and regression tasks [3,4].

In contrast, unsupervised learning uses unlabeled data to reveal hidden patterns and/or structures when there are no predefined answers [4]. Such learning is commonly used for clustering (e.g., segmentation of customer data during targeted marketing) and dimensionality reduction (e.g., compression of high-dimensional genomic data). Principal component analysis is commonly used for unsupervised learning and reduces data complexity while preserving important features. K-means clustering groups data points on the basis of their similarity, revealing underlying distributions in large datasets [5]. Generative modeling is a form of unsupervised learning that has become very popular in recent years. ML systems create new data samples based only on training data.

Generative Modeling and Neural Networks

Recent advances in generative modeling include generative neural networks, which can be divided into generative adversarial networks and variational autoencoders [6]. These architectures generate new data that closely resemble those of a given dataset. Generative adversarial networks, first introduced by Ian Goodfellow in 2014, comprise two neural networks—a generator and a discriminator—that mutually compete [7]. The generator creates synthetic data, and the discriminator determines whether the data are real or fake. Over time, this adversarial process forces the generator to create increasingly realistic outputs, which have been used in fields ranging from medical image synthesis to drug discovery, deepfake technology, and art. In contrast, variational autoencoders use probabilistic encoding to learn latent data representations and then engage in highly effective image denoising, anomaly detection, and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction [8].

RL is an even more advanced paradigm in which an agent learns how to make decisions by interacting with an environment while receiving feedback in the form of rewards or penalties [9,10]. Unlike supervised learning, which requires large labeled datasets, RL optimizes decision-making via trial and error and finds applications in robotics, autonomous driving, and gaming AI, in which the systems must dynamically adapt to new and complex scenarios [10]. RL has also aided the development of AlphaGo and AlphaFold, aiding strategic decision-making and prediction of protein structures, respectively [11].

Key Algorithms and Techniques in ML

ML models are built using a variety of algorithms, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. A schematic representation of the various ML algorithms is shown in Fig. 1, illustrating their underlying models and computational structures [12]. Linear regression and logistic regression are the foundational algorithms that predict numerical outcomes and binary classifications, respectively. More sophisticated techniques include decision trees, support vector machines, and ensemble learning methods such as random forest and gradient boosting (e.g., XGBoost, LightGBM) [13,14]. All of these combine multiple weak learners to improve predictive performance. One of the recent examples of ML studies compared logistic regression with other multiple advanced ML algorithms for retear prediction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs [15]. In recent years, deep learning, a subset of ML inspired by the structure of the human brain, has revolutionized fields such as computer vision, speech recognition, and NLP.

Deep learning models, particularly ANNs and CNNs, excel in the analysis of complex, high-dimensional data such as images, audio, and text [14]. For example, CNNs have transformed image recognition tasks using hierarchical layers to detect patterns like edges, shapes, and textures, enabling breakthroughs in medical imaging, facial recognition, and autonomous navigation. Multiple studies have used CNNs to evaluate diagnostic images such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), like measuring fatty infiltration in MRI [16]. Other deep learning architectures, including recurrent neural networks and advanced variants termed long short-term memory networks, handle sequential data, rendering them ideal for applications in speech synthesis, machine translation, and time-series forecasting [17]. In addition, transformer-based models such as the generative pretrained transformer have revolutionized text generation, language understanding, and chatbot applications, demonstrating the power of generative neural networks when processing large-scale natural language data [18].

Explainable AI and Model Interpretability

In addition to traditional techniques, explainable AI (XAI) has garnered significant attention for ML models, particularly deep learning models, as they have become more complex and less easily interpretable. Methods including Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations help to explain model predictions by revealing the hierarchy of factors and how they contribute to the model results [19]. This increases trust and transparency, especially of high-stakes applications in healthcare, finance, and legal decision-making. It is increasingly possible to interpret the operation of ML models, which is essential to ensure fairness, reliability, and ethical deployment.

Despite such remarkable capabilities, ML faces several challenges, including data quality, bias, overfitting, and computational requirements [20,21]. Large datasets are often required to train robust models. Poor-quality data can yield misleading predictions. Overfitting, whereby a model memorizes training data rather than generalizing the data to accommodate new inputs, can reduce real-world performance. Addressing these challenges requires careful feature selection, regularization techniques, and rigorous cross-validation. Recent advances in federated learning and edge AI have mitigated privacy concerns and reduced computational bottlenecks by enabling ML training across decentralized networks without sharing sensitive data.

MACHINE LEARNING IN SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY

Shoulder arthroplasty includes both TSA and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). These surgical approaches underwent a profound transformation after ML integration. Traditional statistical models have long been used to analyze patient data. ML algorithms now afford superior or, at least, non-inferior, predictive accuracy, allowing treatment strategies to become more individualized. In the context of arthroplasty, ML has been used primarily to predict postoperative outcomes and the risk of complications, refine implant selection, and optimize financial management [22]. As the role of ML expands, such decision-support tools are becoming indispensable for surgical planning, risk stratification, and long-term patient care.

Predicting Clinical Outcomes after Shoulder Arthroplasty

One of the most impactful applications of ML in shoulder arthroplasty is the prediction of clinical outcomes, including ROM, pain reduction, functional improvement, and patient satisfaction. ML models trained on vast datasets of preoperative demographic details, radiographic assessments, and patient comorbidities predict the above-mentioned variables with remarkable accuracy. Algorithms including XGBoost and wide and deep neural networks have been used to predict active abduction, forward flexion, and external rotation after TSA and rTSA. These models achieve mean absolute errors ranging from 10° to 21°, surpassing the predictive reliability of traditional regression models [23,24]. Furthermore, ML achieves high accuracy in identifying patients who will experience minimal clinically important differences in functional scores such as the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, and visual analog scale pain score [25]. Such predictive tools help set realistic postoperative expectations for patients and help surgeons in terms of patient selection and surgical decision-making.

ML also plays crucial roles in predicting complications and stratifying patients according to risk. While shoulder arthroplasty has a high success rate, postoperative complications such as infections, dislocations, and implant failures can significantly compromise recovery. ML models that use logistic regression and decision trees and ensemble learning methods such as random forest and various gradient boosting machines predict 30-day postoperative complications with acceptable accuracy [26]. This allows early interventions, enabling surgeons to adjust surgical plans, optimize perioperative antibiotic regimens, and tailor follow-up strategies for high-risk individuals [27-29]. Additionally, deep learning techniques, including CNNs and NLP, have been used to analyze electronic medical records, operative notes, and imaging data to identify signs of periprosthetic joint infection before infection becomes clinically evident [30].

AI-Assisted Implant Selection, Surgical Planning, and Cost Prediction

Other significant advances facilitated by ML include optimization of implant selection and surgical planning. Traditionally, implant choice and positioning relied heavily on the experience of the surgeon and static templates, respectively. ML algorithms facilitate a more data-driven approach, using preoperative CT scans, patient biomechanics, and historical surgical outcomes to suggest the most appropriate type of prosthesis, implant size, and positioning. Some systems integrate 3D imaging with RL techniques to ensure that the implant configurations guarantee long-term joint stability. While the direct application of RL in shoulder surgery is still emerging, its effectiveness in dynamically optimizing clinical outcomes has been demonstrated in related orthopedic contexts. For instance, recent research has used RL to enhance cost-efficiency and adaptive clinical trial designs in knee osteoarthritis to dynamically monitor patients, maximize informative data collection, and minimize overall healthcare costs [23]. CNN-based models are now employed for real-time intraoperative navigation, enhancing glenoid component placement, screw positioning, and soft tissue balancing. Such AI-assisted surgical techniques have been integrated into robotic-assisted arthroplasty systems, improving precision and potentially reducing revision rates [27].

ML is also assisting the health-related financial economy. Predictive models are now being used to estimate the length of hospital stay, readmission risk, and perioperative costs. ML algorithms consider patient comorbidities, surgical complexity, and discharge requirements and achieve accuracy exceeding 85% when forecasting whether a patient will require prolonged hospitalization or a non-home discharge [26]. Additionally, cost estimation models that incorporate ML are being developed to predict perioperative expenditures of implant, anesthesia, rehabilitation needs, and post-discharge care [31,32].

Future Directions in ML for Shoulder Arthroplasty

As ML continues to evolve, further applications in the field of shoulder arthroplasty are likely. The next frontier is the development of personalized predictive models that integrate genomics, lifestyle factors, and patient-reported outcomes to generate highly individualized treatment recommendations. Federated learning approaches effectively enable the sharing of multi-institutional data without compromising patient privacy, significantly reducing biases related to patient diversity and single-institution limitations. Despite these strengths, federated learning does not entirely eliminate biases that may arise from differences in clinical protocols, data collection methods, or patient management strategies across participating institutions. Thus, standardizing data collection procedures and establishing rigorous validation practices are essential to enhance model reliability and clinical applicability. These approaches will further enhance model robustness and generalizability. Additionally, advances in AI-integrated robotics and smart implants—such as sensor-embedded prosthetics that provide adaptive feedback, aiding continuous performance monitoring—may revolutionize arthroplasty [33]. The continued advances in AI and ML are fundamentally reshaping shoulder arthroplasty planning, execution, and evaluation. By enabling more accurate risk assessments, personalized treatment plans, and cost-effective healthcare strategies, ML is not simply augmenting surgical decision-making, it is redefining the standard of care in modern orthopedic practice.

ML in RCTs

RCT is a common cause of shoulder dysfunction in both athletes and aging populations. Clinical evaluation and imaging techniques such as MRI and ultrasound have been the traditional gold standard techniques for diagnosing RCTs. ML has become a transformative tool for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning. Advanced ML models enable precise tear characterization and predict reparability and required postoperative monitoring, enhancing both clinical efficiency and patient outcomes [34].

Diagnostic Applications of ML

One of the most immediate and impactful applications of ML in the context of RCT is automated diagnosis via medical imaging. Deep learning algorithms, particularly CNNs, have been trained to detect full- and partial-thickness tears on MRI and ultrasound scans with remarkable accuracy. The area under the curve (AUC) exceeds 0.90, and ML detects tears as well as or better than human radiologists [34].

One significant advance was automated segmentation of the rotator cuff muscles on MRI images. Traditionally, muscle quality evaluation involved subjective grading systems such as the Goutallier classification, and the results were inconsistent among observers. However, recent ML models allow fully automated segmentation of rotator cuff muscles, extracting quantitative metrics such as the extent of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy with Dice similarity coefficients that exceed 0.92 [35]. Such models offer an objective and reproducible assessment of muscle degeneration, which is crucial for predicting surgical reparability and setting postoperative expectations. Ultrasound-based ML models have also gained traction [36,37]. These models allow early RCT detection, especially in outpatient settings where MRI may not be readily available [37]. In some studies, ML-enhanced ultrasound scan evaluation achieved an accuracy greater than 88% in identifying RCTs, rendering ultrasound screening a viable alternative to MRI [30].

Predicting Rotator Cuff Reparability and Treatment Planning

While RCT must be reliably detected, a more critical clinical question is whether the tear is reparable or not. ML models now predict RCT reparability by integrating preoperative MRI data, tear size, and the extent of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy. One study used an elastic-net logistic regression model to distinguish reparable and irreparable tears with an AUC of 0.85, outperforming conventional scoring systems [38]. Such models are now being deployed as online prediction tools, allowing surgeons to input patient-specific parameters and review personalized reparability probabilities before choosing a surgical approach.

Other applications of ML during surgical planning include prediction of tendon healing and retear risk. A recent study used deep learning to predict the likelihood of rotator cuff retear after surgery based on intraoperative arthroscopic images [39]. By analyzing the integrity of repaired tendons, the models achieved a predictive accuracy of 91%, providing real-time intraoperative insights that aided the adjustment of surgical techniques and/or refinement of postoperative rehabilitation protocols.

Postoperative Monitoring and Outcome Prediction

ML is now being integrated into postoperative monitoring. One of the most promising applications is the use of both smartphone-based motion tracking and ML to assess shoulder function in real-time [40,41]. A recent study demonstrated that markerless motion capture using standard smartphone videos accurately assessed shoulder kinematics and predicted postoperative recovery trajectories. Such ML-powered motion analysis tools aid remote patient monitoring, reducing the need for frequent hospital visits and providing quantitative feedback on recovery. Patients perform simple predefined movement tasks, and the ML algorithm processes the data to detect motion asymmetry, ROM limitation, and compensatory movement patterns, which may indicate potential complications or delayed healing [42,43].

ML is now also used to predict postoperative functional outcomes, including the ASES score and ROM. By analyzing preoperative clinical factors, ML models can forecast which patients are most likely to achieve a meaningful improvement after surgery. Such models exhibit high predictive accuracy (AUCs >0.85), enabling clinicians to set realistic patient expectations and tailor the rehabilitation programs accordingly [44].

Future Directions and Challenges

While ML has demonstrated tremendous promise in terms of RCT diagnosis and management, several challenges remain, including data variability. ML models are often trained on data from single institutions and may not generalize across patient populations [34]. Future efforts should focus on multicenter collaborations and the use of federated learning approaches to develop more robust and generalizable models.

Additionally, model interpretability is of concern. Many deep learning models function as black boxes, hindering understanding of a specific prediction. XAI techniques such as SHAP are being increasingly used to enhance transparency and trust in ML-assisted decision-making. Another challenge is integration of ML models into clinical workflows. While several web-based prediction tools have been developed, widespread adoption requires seamless integration of ML with electronic medical records and surgical navigation systems. Advances in real-time AI assistance during arthroscopy could further enhance intraoperative decision-making, potentially improving surgical precision and long-term outcomes.

APPLICATION IN OTHER SHOULDER CONDITIONS: TRAUMA AND INSTABILITY

In addition to arthroplasty and RCTs, ML is demonstrating promise in managing other complex shoulder conditions, especially trauma and instability. Recent studies have illustrated the potential of ML in enhancing the diagnostic accuracy and optimizing surgical planning in these areas.

Application of ML in Trauma

Chung et al. [45] applied deep learning techniques to automate the detection and classification of proximal humerus fractures using plain radiographs . Their model, based on CNN, achieved superior performance compared with general physicians and orthopedists, particularly in complex 3- and 4-part fractures, demonstrating the potential to significantly enhance initial diagnostic accuracy and facilitate timely interventions. Furthermore, advanced ML methods have been used to assist preoperative planning of proximal humerus fractures. Jeon et al. [46] developed an AI-based virtual reduction model that segments and virtually reduces fracture fragments using CT imaging. Their system significantly improved reduction accuracy, operational speed, and overall reduction quality compared with manual methods, supporting surgeons in achieving anatomical alignment with greater efficiency and precision.

Application of ML in Shoulder Instability

Research has demonstrated the utility of ML in shoulder instability surgery. Predictive ML models, using demographic and clinical data, have been developed to forecast outcomes following surgical intervention for anterior shoulder instability, helping surgeons tailor their approaches to individual patient profiles, potentially improving postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction [47].

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of ML into orthopedic research has significantly improved the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of RCTs. Using advanced algorithms, ML successfully identifies critical clinical variables, enhances predictive accuracy, and serves as a decision-support tool for clinicians. Such advances ensure more efficient and precise patient care, reducing diagnostic uncertainty and optimizing treatment strategies. Despite these promising developments, challenges remain before ML can be widely adopted in clinical practice. Model generalizability, interpretability, and integration into existing healthcare systems require further refinement. Collaborative efforts among institutions and the implementation of explainable AI techniques are essential to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of ML applications in orthopedics.

Future research should focus on the expansion of multicenter datasets, incorporation of real-time ML applications, and refinement of predictive models to further improve patient outcomes. By leveraging the strengths of ML, orthopedic surgeons can develop a more data-driven personalized approach to patient care, ultimately improving clinical decision-making and surgical success rates.

NOTES

Author contributions

Conceptualization: SHC. Data curation: SHC. Formal Analysis: SHC. Investigation: SHC. Methodology: SHC. Software: SHC. Supervision: YSK. Validation: YSK. Visualization: SHC. Writing – original draft: SHC. Writing – review & editing: YSK. All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

Funding

None.

Data availability

None.

Acknowledgments

None.

Fig. 1.

Schematic representation of machine learning algorithms. It illustrates the structural frameworks of different machine learning models, including supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and deep learning techniques.

REFERENCES

1. Janiesch C, Zschech P, Heinrich K. Machine learning and deep learning. Electron Mark 2021;31:685–95.

2. Bell J. What is machine learning? In: Carta S, ed. Machine learning and the city: applications in architecture and urban design. John Wiley and Sons; 2022. p. 207-16.

3. Nasteski V. An overview of the supervised machine learning methods. Horizons 2017;4:51–62.

4. Alloghani M, Al-Jumeily D, Mustafina J, Hussain A, Aljaaf AJ. A systematic review on supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms for data science. In: Berry M, Mohamed A, Yap B, eds. Supervised and unsupervised learning for data science. Springer; 2020. p. 3-21.

5. Naeem S, Ali A, Anam S, Ahmed MM. An unsupervised machine learning algorithms: comprehensive review. Int J Comput Digit Syst 2023;13:911–21.

6. Doersch C. Tutorial on variational autoencoders. arXiv [Preprint]. 2016 [cited 2025 Apr 10]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.05908.

7. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative adversarial networks. Commun ACM 2020;63:139–44.

8. Jovanovic M, Campbell M. Generative artificial intelligence: trends and prospects. IEEE 2022;55:107–12.

9. Arulkumaran K, Deisenroth MP, Brundage M, Bharath AA. Deep reinforcement learning: a brief survey. EEE Signal Process Mag 2017;34:26–38.

10. Sutton RS, Barto AG. Reinforcement learning: an introduction. MIT press; 1998.

11. Lapan M. Deep reinforcement learning hands-on: apply modern RL methods, with deep Q-networks, value iteration, policy gradients, TRPO, AlphaGo Zero and more. Packt Publishing; 2018.

12. Mahesh B. Machine learning algorithms: a review. Int J Sci Res 2020;9:381–6.

13. Chen T, He T, Benesty M, et al. Xgboost: extreme gradient boosting. R package version 04-2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.

14. Muhamedyev RI. Machine learning methods: an overview. Comput Model NEW Technol 2015;19:14–29.

15. Cho SH, Kim YS. Predicting major preoperative risk factors for retears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using machine learning algorithms. J Clin Med 2025;14:1843.

16. Ro K, Kim JY, Park H, et al. Deep-learning framework and computer assisted fatty infiltration analysis for the supraspinatus muscle in MRI. Sci Rep 2021;11:15065.

17. Sherstinsky A. Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Physica D 2020;404:132306.

18. Floridi L, Chiriatti M. GPT-3: its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds Mach 2020;30:681–94.

19. Došilović FK, Brčić M, Hlupić N. Explainable artificial intelligence: a survey. 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO). IEEE; 2018.

20. Ying X. An overview of overfitting and its solutions. J Phys Conf Ser 2019;1168:022022.

21. Jabbar HK, Khan RZ. Methods to avoid over-fitting and under-fitting in supervised machine learning (comparative study). Comput Sci Commun Instrum Devices 2015;70:978–81.

22. Karlin EA, Lin CC, Meftah M, Slover JD, Schwarzkopf R. The impact of machine learning on total joint arthroplasty patient outcomes: a systemic review. J Arthroplasty 2023;38:2085–95.

23. Patel AV, Stevens AJ, Mallory N, et al. Modern applications of machine learning in shoulder arthroplasty: a review. JBJS Rev 2023;11:e22.00225.

24. Franceschetti E, Gregori P, De Giorgi S, et al. Machine learning can predict anterior elevation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a new tool for daily outpatient clinic. Musculoskelet Surg 2024;108:163–71.

25. Kumar V, Roche C, Overman S, et al. Using machine learning to predict clinical outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty with a minimal feature set. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021;30:e225–36.

26. Karimi AH, Langberg J, Malige A, Rahman O, Abboud JA, Stone MA. Accuracy of machine learning to predict the outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. Arthroplasty 2024;6:26.

27. Barreto Vega A, Ramkumar PN, Kassam H, Navarro RA. Advanced technology in shoulder arthroplasty surgery: artificial intelligence, extended reality, and robotics. Shoulder Elbow 2024;16:347–51.

28. Boubekri A, Murphy M, Scheidt M, et al. Artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms versus standard linear demographic analysis in predicting implant size of anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2024;8:e24.00182

29. Kunze KN, Jang SJ, Li TY, et al. Artificial intelligence for automated identification of total shoulder arthroplasty implants. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023;32:2115–22.

30. Gupta P, Haeberle HS, Zimmer ZR, Levine WN, Williams RJ, Ramkumar PN. Artificial intelligence-based applications in shoulder surgery leaves much to be desired: a systematic review. JSES Rev Rep Tech 2023;3:189–200.

31. Bajgain B, Lorenzetti D, Lee J, Sauro K. Determinants of implementing artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support tools in healthcare: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2023;13:e068373

32. Moulaei K, Yadegari A, Baharestani M, Farzanbakhsh S, Sabet B, Reza Afrash M. Generative artificial intelligence in healthcare: a scoping review on benefits, challenges and applications. Int J Med Inform 2024;188:105474.

33. Bozzo A, Tsui JM, Bhatnagar S, Forsberg J. Deep learning and multimodal artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024;32:e523–32.

34. Rodriguez HC, Rust B, Hansen PY, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in rotator cuff tears. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2023;31:67–72.

35. Kim SH, Yoo HJ, Yoon SH, et al. Development of a deep learning-based fully automated segmentation of rotator cuff muscles from clinical MR scans. Acta Radiol 2024;65:1126–32.

36. Tonni G, Grisolia G. Simulator, machine learning, and artificial intelligence: time has come to assist prenatal ultrasound diagnosis. J Clin Ultrasound 2023;51:1164–5.

37. Lee K, Yang J, Lee MH, Chang JH, Kim JY, Hwang JY. USG-Net: deep learning-based ultrasound scanning-guide for an orthopedic sonographer. In: Proceedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2022: 25th International Conference; 2022 Sep 18-22; Singapore; 2022. p. 23-32.

38. Do WS, Shin SH, Lim JR, Yoon TH, Chun YM. Predicting the reparability of rotator cuff tears: machine learning and comparison with previous scoring systems. Am J Sports Med 2024;52:3512–9.

39. Cho SH, Kim YS. Prediction of retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair based on intraoperative arthroscopic images using deep learning. Am J Sports Med 2023;51:2824–30.

40. Darevsky DM, Hu DA, Gomez FA, Davies MR, Liu X, Feeley BT. Algorithmic assessment of shoulder function using smartphone video capture and machine learning. Sci Rep 2023;13:19986.

41. Lee HJ, Jin SM, Kim SJ, et al. Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based motion analysis system for upper extremity rehabilitation exercises in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Healthcare (Basel) 2023;12:7.

42. Silver JK, Dodurgali MR, Gavini N. Artificial intelligence in medical education and mentoring in rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2024;103:1039–44.

43. Sumner J, Lim HW, Chong LS, Bundele A, Mukhopadhyay A, Kayambu G. Artificial intelligence in physical rehabilitation: a systematic review. Artif Intell Med 2023;146:102693.

44. Li C, Alike Y, Hou J, et al. Machine learning model successfully identifies important clinical features for predicting outpatients with rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023;31:2615–23.

45. Chung SW, Han SS, Lee JW, et al. Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm. Acta Orthop 2018;89:468–73.

46. Jeon YD, Jung KH, Kim MS, Kim H, Yoon DK, Park KB. Clinical validation of artificial intelligence-based preoperative virtual reduction for Neer 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024;25:669.

47. Till SE, Lu Y, Reinholz AK, et al. Artificial intelligence can define and predict the "Optimal observed outcome" after anterior shoulder instability surgery: an analysis of 200 patients with 11-year mean follow-up. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2023;5:100773.